Amazon reviews: Loved, but also to be trusted?
Amazon has been successful in leveraging users to review its products … now, the integrity of those reviews are at stake.
Amazon has been incredibly successful in leveraging crowds – in the form of its own customers – to review products sold through Amazon.com. The reviews create value for both sides in the marketplace. Customers can rely on reviews to research a product before buying, filter purchase options with minimum rating levels. Sellers benefit from a free marketing boost if obtaining many positive reviews and also get direct feedback from customers on how they perceive the product. Finally, Amazon itself captures value by providing an easy way for customers to evaluate purchases on its platform and by boosting traffic to well-performing sellers (which helps minimize customer complaints).
So, 5-star products are all good – right? Not necessarily!
Sellers have high incentives to manipulate their reviews, either to boost ratings of their own product or to drag down competitor ratings. Amazon has even seen politically motivated review-manipulation. Just a few hours after Hillary Clinton’s book “What Happened” had been released, the book quickly received 1,660 reviews which were either 1 or 5-star ratings. Amazon later found these to be fake and removed them [1]. Other fake reviews are more innocent of nature (I in particular like the banana slicer review below).
Banana slicer review
Up until October 2016, Amazon allowed sellers to provide discounts to customer in exchange for customer reviews. ReviewMeta [2] found that this policy significantly boosted the weight of incentivized reviews to make out the majority of ratings – and tended to be a lot more favorable. In October 2016, Amazon banned these reviews [3]. Today, however, review integrity still remains an issue – according to Fakespot.com (a site the analyzes suspicious reviews on Amazon) 40% of reviews are unreliable* [4].
Amazon reviews increasingly incentivized … and makes reviews a lot more favorable
Source: ReviewMeta – 7 million review sample [2].
What Amazon is doing to combat fake reviews
Quality customer reviews are integral to Amazon’s business model – it is therefore no surprise that Amazon is defending review integrity fiercely:
- Law suits:聽In 2015-2016, Amazon sued both its own sellers sellers and more than 1,000 individuals for having solicited or provided fake reviews [5]. While helpful as a deterrent, suing all fake reviewers ex post is a quite resource intensive strategy.
- “Verified Purchase”:聽Reviewers who Amazon can track in the system to have actually bought a product have a “verified purchase” tagged to their reviews. This will deter sellers from soliciting reviews, or at least so for high ticket items. Recently, sellers have found a way around: an elderly Boston couple started receiving countless smaller products from Amazon that they didn’t order — purchased by a seller who used their address to “verify” a purchase and earn the right to review [6].
- “X# people found helpful”: Customers can up/downvote reviews that are found precise and helpful.
- AI screen: Finally, Amazon uses AI to detect precise and trustworthy reviews and give them a preferential weight and placement聽[7].
* The site only analyses reviews reported by customers, which would most likely bias the result upwards.
Sources:
摆1闭听丑迟迟辫蝉://飞飞飞.颈苍诲别辫别苍诲别苍迟.肠辞.耻办/苍别飞蝉/飞辞谤濒诲/补尘别谤颈肠补蝉/丑颈濒濒补谤测-肠濒颈苍迟辞苍-尘别尘辞颈谤-补尘补锄辞苍-蹿补办别-谤别惫颈别飞蝉-谤别尘辞惫别诲-耻蝉-辫谤别蝉颈诲别苍迟-别濒别肠迟颈辞苍-诲辞苍补濒诲-迟谤耻尘辫-补7945876.丑迟尘濒
摆2闭听丑迟迟辫蝉://谤别惫颈别飞尘别迟补.肠辞尘/产濒辞驳/补苍补濒测蝉颈蝉-辞蹿-7-尘颈濒濒颈辞苍-补尘补锄辞苍-谤别惫颈别飞蝉-肠耻蝉迟辞尘别谤蝉-飞丑辞-谤别肠别颈惫别-蹿谤别别-辞谤-诲颈蝉肠辞耻苍迟别诲-颈迟别尘-尘耻肠丑-尘辞谤别-濒颈办别濒测-迟辞-飞谤颈迟别-辫辞蝉颈迟颈惫别-谤别惫颈别飞/
摆3闭听丑迟迟辫蝉://迟别肠丑肠谤耻苍肠丑.肠辞尘/2016/10/03/补尘补锄辞苍-产补苍蝉-颈苍肠别苍迟颈惫颈锄别诲-谤别惫颈别飞蝉-迟颈别诲-迟辞-蹿谤别别-辞谤-诲颈蝉肠辞耻苍迟别诲-辫谤辞诲耻肠迟蝉/
摆4闭听丑迟迟辫蝉://飞飞飞.蹿辞虫25产辞蝉迟辞苍.肠辞尘/苍别飞蝉/肠辞苍蝉耻尘别谤/蝉丑辞辫辫颈苍驳-辞苍-补尘补锄辞苍-丑辞飞-迟辞-迟别濒濒-颈蹿-谤别惫颈别飞蝉-补谤别-蹿补办别-1/694913717
[5]聽https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/27/amazon-sues-more-sellers-for-buying-fake-reviews/ and聽https://gizmodo.com/amazon-starts-suing-its-own-sellers-in-latest-fight-aga-1780043360
摆6闭听丑迟迟辫蝉://飞飞飞.产辞蝉迟辞苍驳濒辞产别.肠辞尘/产耻蝉颈苍别蝉蝉/2018/02/06/迟丑别蝉别-辫别辞辫濒别-办别别辫-驳别迟迟颈苍驳-尘测蝉迟别谤测-辫补肠办补驳别蝉-蹿谤辞尘-补尘补锄辞苍-迟丑别测-诲颈诲苍-辞谤诲别谤/叠办础辩4丑肠齿谤辞颁狈尝痴搁辩鲍辩4谤迟尝/蝉迟辞谤测.丑迟尘濒?蝉冲肠补尘辫补颈驳苍=产辞蝉迟辞苍驳濒辞产别%3础蝉辞肠颈补濒蹿濒辞飞%3础迟飞颈迟迟别谤&补尘辫;冲冲迟飞颈迟迟别谤冲颈尘辫谤别蝉蝉颈辞苍=迟谤耻别
摆7闭听丑迟迟辫蝉://飞飞飞.产辞蝉迟辞苍驳濒辞产别.肠辞尘/产耻蝉颈苍别蝉蝉/2018/02/06/迟丑别蝉别-辫别辞辫濒别-办别别辫-驳别迟迟颈苍驳-尘测蝉迟别谤测-辫补肠办补驳别蝉-蹿谤辞尘-补尘补锄辞苍-迟丑别测-诲颈诲苍-辞谤诲别谤/叠办础辩4丑肠齿谤辞颁狈尝痴搁辩鲍辩4谤迟尝/蝉迟辞谤测.丑迟尘濒
Interesting post! Amazon takes the integrity of customer reviews extremely seriously. I worked on the Amazon Vine program this past summer. Vine enables sellers to pay for reviews, but Amazon manages the entire process to preserve the integrity of the reviews. For example, sellers send goods to Amazon and then Amazon sends the goods to the reviewer in order to prevent sellers from ever interacting directly with reviewers. Even with these measures in place though there definitely continues to be issues. I can鈥檛 imagine the elimination of all 鈥渇ake鈥� reviews will ever be achieved, but it will be interesting to see how Amazon leverages ever more sophisticated technology to help ensure reviews are genuine, especially given the importance the organization places on this.
Interesting read and I guess it makes sense that an entire market is emerging for independent review sites that consumers place greater trust in. Specifically, “The Sweet Home” is one such review site, which does extensive product reviews on many products sold in Amazon’s marketplace. The company was acquired by the NYT and in the press release the newspaper cited the 茂ntegrity of Sweet Home’s approach as a fit with their own journalistic standards.
Yes! The Sweet Home is pretty cool. I also stumbled upon ReviewMeta.com and Fakespot.com, where you can just copy paste in the Amazon URL and it will tell you an adjust star-rating (1-5) based on its algorithms for detecting fake reviews.
That’s a great functionality. Could or has this been built into a service where you can browse a curated version / a true-er version of Amazon, (where the products you browse and their ratings have been verified)?
That would be amazing. In general, Amazon has been called out a lot in recent years for their aggressive behavior towards their vendors, but in general I feel like they have not been called out enough for their aggressive and potentially value destroying behavior towards their own consumers – who are quite powerless in the shadow of its power.
“Post-Amazon Revolution!”