{"id":33831,"date":"2018-11-13T18:20:24","date_gmt":"2018-11-13T23:20:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/digital.hbs.edu\/platform-rctom\/submission\/statdx-can-machine-learning-improve-radiology-diagnostics\/"},"modified":"2018-11-13T18:20:24","modified_gmt":"2018-11-13T23:20:24","slug":"dr-roboto-will-see-you-now-improving-radiology-diagnostics","status":"publish","type":"hck-submission","link":"https:\/\/d3.harvard.edu\/platform-rctom\/submission\/dr-roboto-will-see-you-now-improving-radiology-diagnostics\/","title":{"rendered":"Dr. Roboto Will See You Now \u2013 Improving Radiology Diagnostics"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
Over the last fifteen years, as diagnostic imaging has become more accurate and as new methods of imaging have been created, the volume of imaging has increased dramatically. For example, a typically CT exam in 1999 would have yielded 82 images while today that same exam would yield 679. As a consequence, American radiologists have had to dramatically increase their workload. Today, American radiologists are charged with examining an image every 3-4 seconds over the course of an 8 hour work day[1].This high volume of analysis and required speed puts stress on the potential accuracy of diagnoses. 75% of radiology malpractice claims are due to misdiagnosis [2]. Enter StatDx.<\/p>\n
StatDx operates as a clinical decision support tool, built by radiologists for other radiologists. It has the largest database of radiology cases (over 20,000) and expert-written diagnoses to help radiologists increase their speed and accuracy[3]. When viewing an image, radiologists can log onto StatDx and test a potential diagnosis. StatDx will share that diagnosis as well as any other differential diagnoses, ordered by frequency. Each differential diagnosis is supplemented by symptoms, case studies, and typical images, so that the radiologist can compare their image against the standard before making a final diagnosis.<\/p>\n