{"id":5105,"date":"2017-04-05T17:32:16","date_gmt":"2017-04-05T21:32:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/digital.hbs.edu\/platform-digit\/submission\/inbloom-data-driven-learning-flounders-amidst-panicked-political-climate\/"},"modified":"2017-04-05T17:38:16","modified_gmt":"2017-04-05T21:38:16","slug":"inbloom-data-driven-learning-flounders-amidst-panicked-political-climate","status":"publish","type":"hck-submission","link":"https:\/\/d3.harvard.edu\/platform-digit\/submission\/inbloom-data-driven-learning-flounders-amidst-panicked-political-climate\/","title":{"rendered":"InBloom: Data Driven Learning Flounders Amidst Panicked Political Climate"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/u><\/u>InBloom is a story of unfulfilled data potential. The narrative is perhaps a familiar one \u2026 U.S. political forces grappled with the trade-offs between privacy and efficacy, and the confused regulatory environment that resulted hindered important, life-improving innovation.<\/p>\n

This particular story takes place in the education sector. InBloom was an education non-profit endowed with $100 million from the Gates and Carnegie Foundations. The organization\u2019s mission was to consolidate and clean student data from across the many fragmented student data warehouses. The ultimate goal was to make the data available for proprietary InBloom \u00a0and district-approved third party dashboards that would 1) allow teachers to tailor instruction to each student and 2) would allow administrators to make more informed management decisions. Many initially praised InBloom\u2019s attempt to make student data more actionable. However, the organization faced a tsunami of well-mobilized parent and legislative resistance and was forced to wind down in 2014.[1]<\/a>\u00a0Heres\u2019 the value creation\/value capture story as well as ideas on how future education companies can avoid InBloom\u2019s fate.<\/p>\n

Value Creation – The Promise of Data Driven Education<\/strong><\/p>\n

Let me start with the basics \u2026 The current system of education is outdated. Students that can\u2019t keep up with the average classroom pace fall through the cracks, while advanced students grow bored and restless. Research and common sense consistently indicate that people learn in different ways \u2013 the preferred mode of learning, the desired nature of content, and the pacing can vary dramatically from student to student. Data has the potential to play a huge role in in delivering a more student-centric form of learning. Here are just a few of the various uses cases through which data can create value in the classroom:<\/p>\n