{"id":5105,"date":"2017-04-05T17:32:16","date_gmt":"2017-04-05T21:32:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/digital.hbs.edu\/platform-digit\/submission\/inbloom-data-driven-learning-flounders-amidst-panicked-political-climate\/"},"modified":"2017-04-05T17:38:16","modified_gmt":"2017-04-05T21:38:16","slug":"inbloom-data-driven-learning-flounders-amidst-panicked-political-climate","status":"publish","type":"hck-submission","link":"https:\/\/d3.harvard.edu\/platform-digit\/submission\/inbloom-data-driven-learning-flounders-amidst-panicked-political-climate\/","title":{"rendered":"InBloom: Data Driven Learning Flounders Amidst Panicked Political Climate"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/u><\/u>InBloom is a story of unfulfilled data potential. The narrative is perhaps a familiar one \u2026 U.S. political forces grappled with the trade-offs between privacy and efficacy, and the confused regulatory environment that resulted hindered important, life-improving innovation.<\/p>\n
This particular story takes place in the education sector. InBloom was an education non-profit endowed with $100 million from the Gates and Carnegie Foundations. The organization\u2019s mission was to consolidate and clean student data from across the many fragmented student data warehouses. The ultimate goal was to make the data available for proprietary InBloom \u00a0and district-approved third party dashboards that would 1) allow teachers to tailor instruction to each student and 2) would allow administrators to make more informed management decisions. Many initially praised InBloom\u2019s attempt to make student data more actionable. However, the organization faced a tsunami of well-mobilized parent and legislative resistance and was forced to wind down in 2014.[1]<\/a>\u00a0Heres\u2019 the value creation\/value capture story as well as ideas on how future education companies can avoid InBloom\u2019s fate.<\/p>\n Value Creation – The Promise of Data Driven Education<\/strong><\/p>\n Let me start with the basics \u2026 The current system of education is outdated. Students that can\u2019t keep up with the average classroom pace fall through the cracks, while advanced students grow bored and restless. Research and common sense consistently indicate that people learn in different ways \u2013 the preferred mode of learning, the desired nature of content, and the pacing can vary dramatically from student to student. Data has the potential to play a huge role in in delivering a more student-centric form of learning. Here are just a few of the various uses cases through which data can create value in the classroom:<\/p>\n And these examples constitute just a drop in the bucket. McKinsey\u2019s education team estimates that the use of student data could \u201cunlock between $900 billion and $1.2 trillion global economic value; upwards of $300 billion would come from improved instruction.\u201d[5]<\/a><\/p>\n Value Capture – Multiple Paths to Sustainability<\/strong><\/p>\n InBloom was a non-profit because they knew any profit motive would invite intense public scrutiny. Also, capturing value in the K-12 sector is difficult \u2013 budgets are limited and sales cycles are long. Yet, there are a number of education data companies that have found creative ways to capture the value they create. A few business models that have been successful include:<\/p>\n What Went Wrong? \u2026 \u00a0The Political Obstacles to the use of Data<\/strong><\/p>\n So what happened? InBloom underestimated the anti-surveillance, pro-privacy political winds mobilizing against them. In a post-Snowden era, concerns around privacy are entirely valid, but I believe they need to be balanced with an appreciation for how data can The political obstacles to the collection and utilization of learning data are formidable. A 2016 report from the TRUSTe\/National Cyber Security Alliance (NCSA) Consumer Privacy Index indicated that “more Americans are worried about their data privacy than they are about losing their main source of income.”[7]<\/a>\u00a0As such, compromise will be required on all ends – parents will need to make allowances, policy makers will need to craft responsible and flexible regulation, and companies will need to assuage concerns through a variety of measures. McKinsey suggests that data education companies can learn a lot from other sectors. Some recommended tactics include developing unambiguous and accessible privacy policies, more effectively communicating the benefits of data, adopting sector wide data standards, and treating districts as partners in the communication process.<\/p>\n As the Economist wrote, InBloom was one of the \u201cfirst major big-data casualties \u2013 a victim of exaggerated fears and misunderstanding.\u201d[9]<\/a> While I\u2019m sure it won\u2019t be the last, education data enthusiasts have learned from the past and appear to be moving forward with renewed optimism.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n [1]<\/a>http:\/\/blogs.edweek.org\/edweek\/DigitalEducation\/2014\/04\/inbloom_to_shut_down_amid_growing_data_privacy_concerns.html<\/p>\n [2]<\/a> Interview with David Roth, Senior Direct of Data Systems at Aspire Public Schools<\/p>\n [3]<\/a> Interview with David Roth, Senior Direct of Data Systems at Aspire Public Schools<\/p>\n [4]<\/a> http:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/industries\/public-sector\/our-insights\/protecting-student-data-in-a-digital-world<\/p>\n [5]<\/a> http:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/industries\/public-sector\/our-insights\/protecting-student-data-in-a-digital-world<\/p>\n [6]<\/a> https:\/\/www.parentmap.com\/article\/student-data<\/p>\n\n
\n
<\/a>also enhance our lives. Specific parent\/teacher concerns included the following:[6]<\/a><\/p>\n\n